Gulyás: Linking EU Funds to Judiciary Reform ‘Nonsensical’


Linking payments of the EU’s Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) to “judiciary reform” in Hungary is “nonsensical”, the prime minister’s chief of staff told a regular press briefing.


The Hungarian judiciary reform was concluded nine years ago in perfect coordination with the European Commission, and so the condition is actually a criticism of the previous Commission rather than the government, Gergely Gulyás said. An agreement on the recovery funding is “up to the Commission … but our experiences in the past few days are not good”, he said. Since education is in the hands of the member states, the EC’s argument is “extremely weak”, he said.

Gulyás said that if EU funding will be withheld from Hungary at all, it will be because of the EU’s objections to the child protection law rather than risk of corruption as stated in the European Union’s recent report on the rule of law in Hungary. Although Hungary’s EU membership “has no alternative”, the government rejects EU institutions’ attempts at “stealthy power grabs” and to claw competencies from member states, he said. Hungary, among other member states in central European and elsewhere, rejects the EU’s Fit for 55 climate protection plan and stands by the view that the largest polluters, rather than EU citizens, should bear the costs of climate protection, Gulyás said.

Regarding press reports that some 300 Hungarians, opposition politicians and journalists among them, were wiretapped using Pegasus, an Israeli-developed spy software, Gulyás insisted there were no allegations of unlawful actions in the reports. “If everything was done within the bounds of the law, all is well,” he said. The “artificially stoked hysterics” around Pegasus “fits well into the international environment the Hungarian government has had to face in the past few days”, he said. No one was wiretapped because of their political views or because they are journalists, he said. “We support the national security council in fulfilling its analytic tasks. We do not support scare-mongering,” Gulyás said. National security procedures are subject to rigorous control mechanisms, and the harvested data can only be used for the purposes defined by law, he noted. The Hungarian security services collected data only in line with the relevant regulations, he said. The procedures will be reviewed by parliament’s national security committee, he added. Referring to the opposition’s recent attempt to convene an extraordinary session of the committee, he said “the specific technology of data collection” did not warrant such a session.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *